The results of a new study from researchers in Belgium suggest that any shift from conventional to alternative housing systems for laying hens should be accompanied by a keen concern for optimising and maintaining Salmonella surveillance programs, due to an increased risk of bird-to-bird transmission and internal egg contamination in some non-traditional housing systems.
The study, “Effect of Housing on Transmission of Salmonella,” will appear in the July issue of Poultry Science, said the Poultry Science Association (PSA), which publishes the journal.
According to the study’s lead author, Dr. Jantina De Vylder, Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Ghent University, the researchers sought to quantify the effect of housing systems on the spread of Salmonella infection within a group of layers and on internal egg contamination.
They found that aviary and floor housing systems pose a greater risk of bird-to-bird transmission of Salmonella Enteritidis than traditional battery cages and furnished cages. The study also found a higher number of eggs that were internally contaminated by Salmonella in aviary systems, as compared both to cage systems and the floor system.
“We found a slightly higher bird-to-bird transmission rate in aviary systems, and an even more pronounced rate for floor systems in comparison with cage systems. Given that we controlled for a number of other variables that might impact transmission rates, we believe that differences inherent to the housing systems – such as hygienic status, air quality, and more intensive contact between birds in large group-housing – are likely responsible,” said De Vylder.
The reason for the higher incidence of Salmonella-contaminated eggs in aviary housing systems, the second major finding of the study, was less clear.
“We were unable to establish any relation between the significantly larger number of internally contaminated eggs in the aviary system and either the internal colonisation or the faecal shedding status of hens. It’s possible that stress could play a role in the difference, but that’s still speculation at this point,” added De Vylder.
The article cites an earlier study which found that stress induces some changes in the hen’s oviduct. This, the authors of the Belgian study say, “might create an environment that is more susceptible for Salmonella survival and also might affect the survival of Salmonella in egg albumen.”
Because of their findings, De Vylder and her co-authors urge that, following a move of laying hens from conventional to alternative housing systems, it is vital for Salmonella control plans to be maintained and for additional care to be taken to minimise within-flock transmission of Salmonella.
The upcoming ban in the European Union on battery cages, which takes effect next January, and broad concerns about the hygienic status of alternative housing systems, prompted a number of earlier studies that tried to determine whether infectious agents like Salmonella Enteritidis spread more readily in non-conventional systems than in battery cages. While most of these epidemiological studies showed a higher prevalence of the bacterium in layer flocks housed in conventional systems, there was some concern, said De Vylder, that their findings may have been influenced by any number of factors, such as farm and flock size, age of the housing system, etc.
“A more recent study controlling for such environmental factors also concluded that alternative housing systems posed no additional risk for Salmonella colonisation of the gut and internal organs than conventional battery cages. However, in this study, all of the birds inoculated with the pathogen were given very high doses – which most likely would not reflect the actual situation in the field. To address this, our group undertook what we believed was a more realistic approach to studying transmission,” said De Vylder.
Source: The Poultry Science Association (PSA)